From the datapoint
to the bedside.

I’m Paulina Del Mundo: physician, MPH from Hopkins (epidemiology and biostatistics), clinical data scientist. Every clinical recommendation rests on a chain that runs from a raw measurement up through an estimate, a trial, and a decision rule. This is my working reference for tracing that chain, from the bedside guideline down to the datapoint it rests on, and back up: study design, causal inference, sensitivity analysis, and the methods writing that holds them together.

MD MPH Hopkins 24.6M+ encounters analyzed

Every recommendation a clinician acts on sits at the end of a pathway. Build it, framing a question and then constructing each rung up to a sound recommendation, or trace it, taking a recommendation that exists and walking back down to the measurement it rests on. Same rungs either way, with a cross-cutting set of moves for defending the result.

New here? The pathway’s Framing rung opens by sorting your question to the kind of evidence it needs, before any method.

Measurement rung

The 120 mmHg systolic target

The 2017 ACC/AHA intensive target leans on a trial that measured blood pressure differently from most clinics. The trace walks the recommendation down to that measurement choice.

Open the trace →

Survey-weighted analysis

NHANES cardiometabolic risk

Survey-weighted analysis, MI, calibration vs AUC, structural-overlap diagnostics in a head-to-head with the Pooled Cohort Equations.

Open the trace →

Difference-in-differences

Part D insulin DiD

A clean Inflation Reduction Act natural experiment: TWFE DiD, event-study, parallel-trends defense, placebo and leave-one-out robustness.

Open the trace →

Real-world data

Medicaid outlier detection

Robust statistics on heavy-tailed data, BH-FDR multiplicity, isolation-forest second opinion, ontology-aware claims-data analysis.

Open the trace →

Model & estimate rungs

Tenecteplase vs alteplase

A non-inferiority appraisal of the 2026 AHA/ASA co-equal thrombolytic recommendation: what a “not worse by more than a margin” result, plus a logistical edge, can and cannot support.

Open the trace →

Trial data standards · SAS & R

CDISC clinical-trial programming

Double-programming an FDA-grade analysis package in SAS and R on the CDISC pilot data: SDTM to ADaM, dictionary coding, tables/figures/listings, byte-level reconciliation.

Open the trace →

New traces and methods go up regularly. to follow along; everything on the site stays free to read.